Congresswoman denies staff used AI to write defense funding amendment
Congresswoman denies staff used AI to write defense funding amendment
国会女议员否认其幕僚使用人工智能撰写国防拨款修正案
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) says her staff used AI for “spellcheck” in an amendment summary for a major defense bill, but denies it was used for the bill text itself and says “NO Legislation is ever drafted with AI.” 佛罗里达州共和党众议员安娜·保利娜·卢纳（Anna Paulina Luna）表示，她的幕僚在为一项重大国防法案撰写修正案摘要时使用了人工智能进行“拼写检查”，但她否认该技术被用于法案正文，并强调“没有任何立法是使用人工智能起草的”。
Luna issued the response after accounts on X began sharing screenshots of an amendment summary for the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. It reads: “Identical to H.R. 100 (118th Congress).11:25 AM????Claude responded: Requires the Secretary of Defense to designate Department of Defense activities, support, and operations at the southwest land border as a named operation with…” 在 X（原推特）上的多个账号开始分享一份关于《2027年国防授权法案》的修正案摘要截图后，卢纳做出了上述回应。该截图显示：“与 H.R. 100（第118届国会）相同。上午11:25 ???? Claude 回复：要求国防部长将西南陆地边界的国防部活动、支持和行动指定为一项名为……的行动。”
At first, Luna’s response seemingly indicated Claude had been used for amendment text. Her post said that “staff used AI to correct a draft text and didn’t edit.” Luna added: “Not a shocker. Most staff use it. I have told them to make sure they are double checking and more thorough.” After users on X began speculating that her staff is using the technology to write bills, Luna edited her response: “Yeah my staff used AI to spell/grammar check the amendment SUMMARY, not the actual amendment text itself,” her post now reads. 起初，卢纳的回应似乎暗示 Claude 被用于撰写修正案正文。她当时发帖称，“幕僚使用了人工智能来校对草案文本，但没有进行编辑。”卢纳补充道：“这并不令人震惊。大多数幕僚都在用它。我已经告诉他们要确保进行二次检查，并更加严谨。”在 X 用户开始猜测她的幕僚正在利用该技术撰写法案后，卢纳修改了她的回应，现在的帖子写道：“是的，我的幕僚使用人工智能对修正案的‘摘要’进行了拼写/语法检查，而不是针对修正案本身的文本。”
She followed it up with another: “FYI NO Legislation is ever drafted with AI. All bill text from the House comes from the House Legislative Council which is prohibited from using AI. The screenshot you’re referencing is an AI summary of the bill that’s also used for spellcheck, cmon man 🤣”. 随后她又补充道：“顺便说一下，没有任何立法是使用人工智能起草的。众议院所有的法案文本都来自众议院立法委员会，该委员会被禁止使用人工智能。你们引用的截图是该法案的人工智能摘要，同时也用于拼写检查，拜托了伙计 🤣”。
As AI tools become more common in workplaces, so are references to the AI chatbots in places where they shouldn’t be. Over the past few years, judges have caught lawyers using AI chatbots to draft legal filings filled with fake citations. Lawmakers around the globe are turning to the technology as well, with city officials in Brazil unknowingly approving an ordinance written with ChatGPT. Arizona state representative Alexander Kolodin has also told The Verge that he’s used ChatGPT to write state-level legislation. 随着人工智能工具在工作场所变得越来越普遍，它们出现在不该出现的地方的情况也随之增加。过去几年里，法官们曾发现律师使用人工智能聊天机器人起草充斥着虚假引用的法律文件。全球各地的立法者也开始转向这项技术，巴西的城市官员曾无意中批准了一项由 ChatGPT 撰写的法令。亚利桑那州众议员亚历山大·科洛丁（Alexander Kolodin）也曾告诉《The Verge》，他曾使用 ChatGPT 撰写州级立法。