Samsung Micro RGB R95H Review (2026): Not the Brightest
Samsung Micro RGB R95H Review (2026): Not the Brightest
三星 Micro RGB R95H 评测（2026）：并非最亮之选
Rating: 6/10 评分：6/10
WIRED: Incredibly easy to set up. The remote is simple to use. Amazing AI Soccer Mode Pro made games more vivid and improved sound clarity. 优点： 设置极其简单。遥控器使用方便。出色的 AI 足球模式 Pro 让比赛画面更生动，并提升了声音清晰度。
TIRED: Colors did not look mind-blowing or realistic. Not as customizable as similar LG or Hisense RGB models. Some minor bugs with streaming apps. 缺点： 色彩表现不够惊艳或真实。自定义程度不如同类的 LG 或海信 RGB 机型。流媒体应用存在一些小故障。
With any new television you set up, you want the colors to pop, the surround sound to boom, and the overall experience to mimic that of a movie theater. This is especially true with new mini RGB televisions, which use red, green, and blue pixels to produce a more vibrant display than the white or blue light of a traditional LED or OLED TV. Micro RGB TVs should bring vibrant color and excellent contrast to moody horror films and bright, fast-paced soccer games alike. 当你安装任何一台新电视时，你都希望色彩鲜艳、环绕声震撼，整体体验能模拟电影院的效果。对于使用红、绿、蓝像素来产生比传统 LED 或 OLED 电视的白光或蓝光更鲜艳显示效果的新型 Mini RGB 电视来说，这一点尤为重要。Micro RGB 电视理应为阴郁的恐怖电影和明快、节奏紧凑的足球比赛带来鲜艳的色彩和出色的对比度。
Instead, Samsung’s Micro RGB R95H is a really good television that doesn’t offer the precise picture-quality controls and other forms of pop and boom as its competitors do. At $3,200 for the 65-inch model, the Samsung R95H just can’t compete with the superior LG Micro RGB Evo. (The smallest LG size is 75 inches and is priced at $4,500; the 75-inch Samsung R95H also retails for $4,500.) Apart from that disparity in size availability, Samsung’s anti-glare tech proved to be an Achilles’ heel, making movies and some video games look too subdued. 然而，三星的 Micro RGB R95H 虽然是一台非常不错的电视，但它无法像竞争对手那样提供精准的画质控制以及其他令人惊艳的视听效果。65 英寸机型售价 3,200 美元，三星 R95H 确实无法与更出色的 LG Micro RGB Evo 竞争。（LG 最小尺寸为 75 英寸，售价 4,500 美元；75 英寸的三星 R95H 零售价也为 4,500 美元。）除了尺寸选择上的差异外，三星的防眩光技术被证明是其“阿喀琉斯之踵”，导致电影和部分电子游戏的画面看起来过于暗淡。
Easy to Set Up and Install
易于设置与安装
Setting up the R95H television is easy and quick, thanks in part to its single pedestal foot that snaps into place in about 10 seconds and doesn’t require screws. Because the TV has a single foot, as opposed to two legs at its edges, I was able to place it atop a smaller hutch. The sides of the 65-inch model stuck out like airplane wings, but the TV was completely stable. R95H 电视的设置既简单又快捷，这部分归功于其单底座支架，它可以在约 10 秒内卡入到位，无需螺丝。由于电视只有一个底座，而不是边缘的两个支脚，我可以把它放在较小的柜子上。65 英寸机型的两侧像飞机机翼一样伸出，但电视非常稳固。
On the side of the R95H television, there are four HDMI ports, including one that is dedicated to gaming (it even has a small video game controller icon) and one for HDMI eARC pass-through audio to a soundbar or AV receiver. There’s also a coaxial connection for cable TV or an antenna, digital optical, two USB ports, and an Ethernet port for a wired connection. Like the Hisense UR9 RGB MiniLED (8/10, WIRED Recommends), the R95H uses Wi-Fi 6E, which is faster than Wi-Fi 6. R95H 电视侧面有四个 HDMI 端口，其中一个专用于游戏（甚至有一个小的视频游戏控制器图标），另一个用于通过 HDMI eARC 将音频传输到条形音箱或 AV 接收器。此外还有一个用于有线电视或天线的同轴接口、数字光纤接口、两个 USB 端口以及一个用于有线连接的以太网端口。与海信 UR9 RGB MiniLED（8/10，WIRED 推荐）一样，R95H 使用比 Wi-Fi 6 更快的 Wi-Fi 6E。
You can also add the Wireless One Connect box—Samsung’s wireless set-top box that connects from about 30 feet away—to add even more external HDMI ports and other connections, like USB. The main advantage of doing so is that it allows you to skip the ports on the R95H itself, which is nice for eliminating cable clutter and also for having a clean wall-mount aesthetic. 你还可以添加无线 One Connect 盒——这是三星的无线机顶盒，可在约 30 英尺（约 9 米）的距离内连接——以增加更多的外部 HDMI 端口和其他连接（如 USB）。这样做主要的好处是让你无需使用 R95H 机身上的端口，这对于消除线缆杂乱以及保持壁挂式安装的整洁美观非常有用。
Samsung uses its own operating system, called Tizen OS, even though I wish it would switch to the more intuitive Google TV, as Hisense and Sony have. Netflix didn’t install and gave me an error (Samsung is looking into the issue), so I ended up testing that app using a Google TV streamer. While the Samsung Frame Pro 2026 did not require me to use the Samsung SmartThings app during setup, I did have to use the app to add R95H and then go through a two-factor authentication process. 三星使用其自有的 Tizen OS 操作系统，尽管我希望它能像海信和索尼那样切换到更直观的 Google TV。Netflix 无法安装并报错（三星正在调查此问题），所以我最终使用 Google TV 流媒体设备测试了该应用。虽然三星 Frame Pro 2026 在设置过程中不需要我使用 Samsung SmartThings 应用，但我确实必须使用该应用来添加 R95H，并完成双重身份验证过程。
On the positive front, I loved using the remote. It’s far more intuitive to use than the LG, Hisense, and TCL remotes that come with their new mini and micro RGB televisions. The R95H remote has fewer buttons, appearing almost like the minimalist Apple TV 4K remote. The Home button is centered, so it’s easy to find in the dark, although there’s no backlighting. I didn’t like that there are separate AI and mic buttons, since those concepts are merging. The AI button navigates to a screen that explains AI features, while the mic button starts Samsung’s Bixby or Amazon’s Alexa+ bots, depending on which one you want to use. 在积极的一面，我非常喜欢这个遥控器。它比 LG、海信和 TCL 随其新款 Mini 和 Micro RGB 电视附带的遥控器直观得多。R95H 遥控器的按钮更少，看起来几乎就像极简的 Apple TV 4K 遥控器。主页按钮位于中心位置，因此在黑暗中很容易找到，尽管它没有背光。我不喜欢它将 AI 和麦克风按钮分开，因为这两个概念正在融合。AI 按钮会导航到解释 AI 功能的屏幕，而麦克风按钮则会启动三星的 Bixby 或亚马逊的 Alexa+ 机器人，具体取决于你想使用哪一个。
I tested Alexa+ and was mostly pleased with how it worked, allowing me to adjust the volume and search for obscure ’90s psychological thrillers. You can enable the Alexa voice prompt and skip the mic button on the remote, but that didn’t work as reliably as I would have liked. A few times, saying “Alexa” didn’t trigger the TV. 我测试了 Alexa+，对其工作方式基本满意，它允许我调节音量并搜索 90 年代冷门的心理惊悚片。你可以启用 Alexa 语音提示并跳过遥控器上的麦克风按钮，但这并没有达到我预期的可靠程度。有几次，喊“Alexa”并没有唤醒电视。
Benched on Benchmarks
基准测试表现
Benchmarks don’t lie, or at least that’s the theory. We all see colors differently, and we respond to contrast and brightness based on our own visual perception. While the R95H met all of the BT.2020 color gamut specs, results of the Spears & Munsil Benchmarks made clear that the R95H’s performance is not as outstanding as that of competitor LG Micro RGB Evo. I could tell skin-tone variance on the Samsung was not quite as obvious: two people who don’t look that similar, complexion-wise, looked about the same on the screen. 基准测试不会撒谎，或者至少理论上是这样。我们每个人对色彩的感知不同，对对比度和亮度的反应也基于个人的视觉感知。虽然 R95H 达到了所有 BT.2020 色域规格，但 Spears & Munsil 基准测试的结果清楚地表明，R95H 的性能不如竞争对手 LG Micro RGB Evo 出色。我可以看出三星在肤色差异的表现上不够明显：两个肤色看起来并不那么相似的人，在屏幕上看起来却差不多。
Picture-quality settings didn’t help that much. Dynamic mode (which other TV makers call Vivid) caused some color blooming and bleeding, and Filmmaker mode made the skin tone scene too dark. The AI picture setting worked the best, especially for soccer, but most of the tweaks related to contrast and brightness didn’t help as much as they did on the LG. 画质设置并没有太大帮助。动态模式（其他电视制造商称为“鲜艳”模式）导致了一些色彩溢出和晕染，而电影制作人模式则使肤色场景显得太暗。AI 画质设置效果最好，特别是在观看足球比赛时，但大多数与对比度和亮度相关的调整并没有像在 LG 电视上那样起到显著作用。
Similarly, the demo reel tests were not as impressive as I would have expected for new display tech. The green grass behind a wooden fence was not as bright as I would have liked for a premium TV. The white mist over a snowy mountain was clearly visible but a little washed out. Picture modes and tweaks to white balance, brightness, and color temp didn’t help that much, either. 同样，演示视频测试也没有达到我对这种新型显示技术所预期的惊艳程度。木栅栏后的绿草并没有达到我心目中高端电视应有的亮度。雪山上的白雾清晰可见，但略显苍白。画质模式以及对白平衡、亮度和色温的调整也没有太大帮助。
The actual LCD screen and anti-glare tech that Samsung uses on the R95H made this TV less susceptible to picture-quality tweaks than the LG or Hisense RGB models I tested. On the LG Micro RGB Evo specifically, simple tweaks to color temp and white balance had a more noticeable impact on picture quality, as did most picture modes. For example, using Vivid picture mode improved the benchmark tests, while Dynamic mode on the R95H didn’t move the needle. Buffalo roaming on a field looked a bit flat due to the anti-glare tech. 三星在 R95H 上使用的实际 LCD 屏幕和防眩光技术，使得这台电视在画质调整上的响应度不如我测试过的 LG 或海信 RGB 机型。特别是在 LG Micro RGB Evo 上，对色温和白平衡的简单调整对画质有更明显的影响，大多数画质模式也是如此。例如，使用“鲜艳”画质模式改善了基准测试结果，而 R95H 上的“动态”模式则几乎没有改善。由于防眩光技术的影响，在田野上漫步的水牛看起来有点平淡。