I think the vibecoding tag has gotten out of hand

我认为“vibecoding”这个标签已经失控了

I was reading this post and noticed the vibecoding had been applied. I’m not sure if this was applied by the lobste.rs team or by the author, but after reading the post it’s pretty clear that the only vibecoding involved is mentioned in an appendix separate from the actual meat of the post, which was well written and the product of sole-human effort and care.

我在阅读这篇文章时，注意到它被贴上了“vibecoding”（氛围编程）的标签。我不确定这是由 lobste.rs 团队还是作者本人添加的，但在读完文章后，很明显其中涉及的“vibecoding”内容仅在附录中被提及，与文章的核心内容是分开的。而文章本身写得很好，是纯粹由人类投入心血创作的成果。

This tag feels like a black mark on what are otherwise interesting posts and has the potential to filter out genuinely human content. In other words, I think the tag does not capture the nuances of actual LLM use and is perhaps being applied too broadly.

这个标签对于原本有趣的文章来说，感觉就像是一个污点，而且它有可能导致真正的人类创作内容被过滤掉。换句话说，我认为这个标签无法捕捉到实际使用大语言模型（LLM）时的细微差别，或许它的应用范围太广了。

edit: it now seems the tag has been removed on that post. I still feel this should be a point of discussion.

编辑：现在看来，该文章上的标签已经被移除了。但我仍然认为这应该成为一个值得讨论的话题。