I Don’t Want to Interact With Stochastic Parrots

我不想与“随机鹦鹉”互动

I Don’t Want to Interact With Stochastic Parrots by Ploum on 2026-09-09 作者：Ploum，日期：2026年9月9日

My AI policy is “I don’t want any kind of interaction with that thing.” And this should be all you need to know. I don’t care if you call it AI, LLM, chatbot, or whateverGPT. I simply don’t want to interact with it in any form. If you interact with me, make sure to never send me any output from those nor to use it as a “source” to justify one of your arguments. 我的 AI 使用原则是：“我不想与那玩意儿进行任何形式的互动。”这就是你需要知道的一切。我不在乎你管它叫 AI、大语言模型（LLM）、聊天机器人还是什么 GPT。我就是不想以任何形式与它互动。如果你要与我交流，请确保永远不要发送任何来自这些工具的输出，也不要将其作为论据的“来源”。

I’m one of those people deeply interested in all the extraordinary stuff other humans have to say. Unfortunately, life is already too short to hear them all. I need to make a lot of choices. That’s why I will not tolerate any attempt to steal the little time I’ve on this planet by making me interact with stochastic algorithms trained to produce tons of “average,” non-human content. 我是一个对人类所表达的非凡见解深感兴趣的人。遗憾的是，生命太短暂，无法听完所有人的心声。我必须做出许多选择。正因如此，我绝不容忍任何试图浪费我有限生命的行为——即强迫我与那些被训练用来生产大量“平庸”、非人类内容的随机算法进行互动。

The direct consequence of my choice is that I will refuse to interact with humans who take pride in making themselves a meat interface between me and the algorithm they’ve chosen to replace their free will. I will not read your website, I will ignore your emails and I will happily walk away from real-life conversations as soon as it is clear that I’m not talking to a fully sentient Homo sapiens sapiens but to an empty shell who has happily delegated their cognitive abilities to an external proprietary tool designed to be some sort of “random average garbage.” 我这一选择的直接后果是，我将拒绝与那些以充当“肉身接口”为荣的人互动——他们把自己置于我和算法之间，用算法取代了自己的自由意志。我不会阅读你的网站，我会忽略你的邮件，一旦发现我面对的不是一个完全有感知力的智人，而是一个乐于将认知能力外包给某种“随机平庸垃圾”的外部专有工具的空壳，我会毫不犹豫地结束现实中的对话。

I will not read the text

我不会阅读这些文本

The very essence of writing is what makes you think. When you write, even something as mundane as a short email, you transform a bunch of contradictory neural stimuli into an ordered thought. If you don’t care to write it, there’s no reason I should waste one single second reading it. The effort should be on your side first. I don’t mind mistakes, typos, or badly formed sentences. In fact, I subtly appreciate them when we interact because they are part of you, they tell a lot about yourself. I’m not a literary agent, I will not judge your way of writing: I’m there to exchange ideas, knowledge, and experiences. 写作的本质在于思考。当你写作时，哪怕只是写一封简短的邮件，你都在将一堆矛盾的神经刺激转化为有序的思想。如果你都不愿亲自去写，那我也没有理由浪费哪怕一秒钟去阅读。努力应该是你先付出的。我不介意错误、错别字或语法不通的句子。事实上，在交流中我反而会欣赏这些瑕疵，因为它们是你的一部分，它们能反映出真实的你。我不是文学经纪人，不会评判你的文笔：我在这里是为了交流思想、知识和经验。

If you find yourself typing a prompt to express your idea, then just send me that prompt. I’m not interested in what an algorithm would do with your prompt, I want to know what you asked in the first place. I care about you, the human. You may find it hard to express yourself, to write what you think: remember that the less you practice, the worse it will be. Prompting might feel easier. It does not make it right. If it is from an algorithm, it is not you. Only you can write what’s inside yourself. 如果你发现自己需要通过输入提示词（prompt）来表达想法，那就直接把那个提示词发给我吧。我对算法如何处理你的提示词不感兴趣，我只想知道你最初想问什么。我关心的是你，作为人类的你。你可能觉得表达自己、写出所思所想很难：但请记住，练习得越少，能力就会越退化。使用提示词或许更轻松，但这并不意味着它是对的。如果内容来自算法，那它就不是你。只有你能写出你内心深处的东西。

I will not look at the pictures

我不会看这些图片

Generated images. Seriously. They all look hideous. When I spot one in a given context, I immediately have a feeling of cheapness, bad taste, and poor culture. Like this fancy restaurant of a luxury hotel I saw in a big European city. It had a huge AI generated picture on its main building: a kid eating malformed fries with his six-fingered hand and putting them in his skull through his cheek. Or this other restaurant which had a very nice menu, full of pictures of Italian cities. Until the kid’s menu which, was shockingly out of place and totally unnecessary. It also showed a kid awkwardly eating a pizza even though there was no pizza on the kid’s menu. 生成式图像。说真的，它们看起来都很丑陋。当我在某个场景中看到一张这类图片时，我立刻会感到一种廉价感、品味低下和文化匮乏。就像我在欧洲某大城市看到的一家豪华酒店的高档餐厅，其主楼上挂着一张巨大的 AI 生成图片：一个孩子用六根手指拿着畸形的薯条，通过脸颊塞进头骨里。又或者另一家餐厅，菜单做得非常精美，满是意大利城市的照片，直到翻到儿童菜单时，出现了一张极其突兀且完全没必要的图片，画着一个孩子笨拙地吃着披萨，尽管菜单上根本没有披萨。

If you don’t have the resources to pay for an artist, you probably don’t need a picture at all. If you are making a poster, write what is important to know instead of burying it in a gloomy generated picture. If you write a blog post, I will not read if it is illustrated by generated pictures. A website illustration, if any, conveys an emotion, a feeling. I sometimes spend more time finding a good illustration for a post than writing it. If I don’t find a satisfying picture, I don’t put any. The first feeling conveyed to me by a generated picture is an uncanny unease, an obnoxious emotion that immediately makes me want to leave. It also tells me enough about the author not to want to know more. It might be a kind of overreaction. But as I said, there’s too much to read anyway so it’s a good first filter. No, that picture is not pretty. No, it is not funny. It doesn’t share any human feeling, any artistic expression. You like it because you had fun generating it. But it is wasting my time. 如果你没有资源聘请艺术家，那你可能根本不需要图片。如果你在制作海报，请写下重要的信息，而不是将其埋没在阴郁的生成式图片中。如果你写博客，如果配图是 AI 生成的，我就不会阅读。网站的插图（如果有的话）应该传达一种情绪或感觉。有时我花在寻找一张好插图上的时间比写文章本身还多。如果找不到满意的图片，我就不放。生成式图片传达给我的第一感觉是诡异的不安，一种令人反感的负面情绪，让我立刻想离开。它也足以让我了解作者，从而不想再深入了解。这可能是一种过激反应，但正如我所说，反正要读的东西太多了，这正好是一个很好的初步筛选器。不，那张图并不好看。不，它也不好笑。它没有分享任何人类情感，没有任何艺术表达。你喜欢它是因为你享受生成它的过程，但这却是在浪费我的时间。

I will not run the code

我不会运行这些代码

I don’t want to run generated code on my computer. Good code is knowledge. Even in a purely productivity-oriented business, every line of code should reflect the choice of an employee knowing the business and choosing a way to solve a business problem. Reality is, of course, different. I’ve worked with enough different codebases to know that proprietary software is simply badly coded. Each line is written assuming “I will not be there anymore to deal with it in a few years.” But at least we know that each line, as bad as it can be, was added by a human for a reason. 我不想在我的电脑上运行生成的代码。好的代码是知识的结晶。即使在纯粹以生产力为导向的企业中，每一行代码也应该反映出员工的选择——他们了解业务，并选择了解决业务问题的方法。当然，现实情况并非如此。我处理过足够多的代码库，深知专有软件的代码质量往往很差。每一行代码的编写都假设着“几年后我就不在了，不用管它”。但至少我们知道，每一行代码，无论多糟糕，都是人类出于某种原因添加的。

LLMs move the needle from “no need to care in a few years” to “no need to care right now.” You cannot assume anything about generated code. Maybe it was simply hallucinated and, by chance, it compiled. Which means that, as soon as generated code is added to a project, the whole project becomes unmaintainable by humans. You can’t understand the code because there’s nothing to understand in the first place! It follows that the whole project now needs LLMs for any change which, will make it even worse from a human perspective. We end up adding more and more lines of code nobody understand where the problem has always been “There are too many lines of code and too few people understand them.” 大语言模型将“几年后不用管”变成了“现在就不用管”。你无法对生成的代码做任何假设。也许它只是幻觉产物，碰巧编译通过了。这意味着，一旦项目中加入了生成的代码，整个项目就变得无法由人类维护了。你无法理解代码，因为代码本身根本就没有逻辑可言！随之而来的结果是，整个项目后续的任何修改都需要依赖大语言模型，这从人类的角度来看只会让情况变得更糟。我们最终添加了越来越多没人理解的代码行，而问题的核心始终是：“代码行数太多，而理解它们的人太少。”

I’m convinced that accepting generated code will lead most projects to become broken beyond all hope of repair in only a few years. “Carefully reviewing” will soon not be enough. Unfathomable code will eventually slip in and gradually destroy the whole project. I predict that the projects too important to be left to rot and die will take decades to recover from those couple years of “assisted productivity.” We need to remember that what we call “code” is merely a spec. 我深信，接受生成的代码将导致大多数项目在短短几年内变得无法修复。单纯的“仔细审查”很快就会失效。晦涩难懂的代码最终会潜入并逐渐摧毁整个项目。我预测，那些过于重要而不能任其腐烂的项目，将需要数十年时间才能从这几年的“辅助生产力”中恢复过来。我们需要记住，我们所谓的“代码”仅仅是一种规范。