Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Opus 5.5: Six AI IKEA 3D Guides Tested

本文为原文前 6,000 字符的节选翻译，完整内容请查看原文。

Kimi K3.1 Pro, Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6 Astra and Gemini 4 Argon attempted the same 24-page IKEA ALEX manual-to-3D task on 25 October 2026. Across six builds and 23 numbered steps, Sol through Codex and Opus tied at 46/46 on the manual rubric. Kimi delivered a working hosted interface but scored 12/46 for assembly correctness.

Kimi K3.1 Pro、Claude Opus 5.5、GPT-6.1 Sol、GPT-6 Astra 和 Gemini 4 Argon 于 2026 年 10 月 25 日尝试了相同的 24 页宜家 ALEX 手册转 3D 任务。在六个构建版本和 23 个编号步骤中，Sol through Codex 和 Opus 在手册评分标准上均以 46/46 的成绩并列。Kimi 提供了一个可运行的托管界面，但在组装正确性方面仅得 12/46 分。

This expanded review preserves the original Opus article’s URL and adds the other results, live demos, effort settings, recorded durations and cost qualifications. Key facts (quick answer) Fact Result Input 24 PNG pages of IKEA ALEX manual AA-2242840-5 Builds 6 builds from 5 model names; GPT-6.1 Sol ran twice.

这份扩展评论保留了原始 Opus 文章的 URL，并增加了其他结果、实时演示、工作量设置、记录时长和成本说明。关键事实（快速回答）：事实结果，输入：24 页宜家 ALEX 手册 AA-2242840-5 的 PNG 图片；构建：来自 5 个模型名称的 6 个构建版本；GPT-6.1 Sol 运行了两次。

Required output Structured inventory, reading log and interactive Three.js website. Manual check 23 steps scored 0, 1 or 2; maximum 46. Feature check 11 interaction and presentation checks. Highest manual scores GPT-6.1 Sol through Codex and Claude Opus 5.5: 46/46. Fastest measured final result Sol through Codex: 19 min 18 s.

所需输出：结构化清单、阅读日志和交互式 Three.js 网站。手册检查：23 个步骤，每步评分 0、1 或 2 分；最高 46 分。功能检查：11 项交互和演示检查。最高手册得分：GPT-6.1 Sol through Codex 和 Claude Opus 5.5：46/46。最快测量最终结果：Sol through Codex：19 分 18 秒。

Kimi timing Unmeasured; no reliable prompt-start timestamp. Dimensions Estimates, not manufacturing drawings. Public demo One dropdown switches between all six results. TL;DR 2 builds scored 46/46 for the tested manual steps: Sol through Codex and Opus. Kimi scored 10.5/11 for features but 12/46 for correctness. Working controls do not prove that the assembly is right.

Kimi 时间：未测量；没有可靠的提示开始时间戳。尺寸：估算值，非制造图纸。公开演示：一个下拉菜单可在所有六个结果之间切换。简而言之：2 个构建版本在测试的手册步骤中获得了 46/46 的分数：Sol through Codex 和 Opus。Kimi 在功能方面得分为 10.5/11，但在正确性方面仅得 12/46。可运行的控件并不能证明组装是正确的。

Astra scored 45/46, losing a point for a transposed desktop-screw identifier. The second Sol run scored 44/46 because step 5 keeps its required panels and bolts hidden. Argon scored 43/46, but its default first-person camera obscures several operations. $2.5562 is Argon’s latest recorded list-price usage, covered by free credits. Subscription API equivalents are estimates, not actual charges.

Astra 得分为 45/46，因桌面螺丝标识符颠倒而扣除一分。第二次 Sol 运行得分为 44/46，因为第 5 步将其所需的面板和螺栓隐藏了。Argon 得分为 43/46，但其默认的第一人称摄像机遮挡了几个操作。2.5562 美元是 Argon 最近记录的标价使用费，由免费额度覆盖。订阅 API 等价物为估算值，而非实际费用。

Where can you try every model? Use the Model dropdown in the live comparison. The original URL now opens the selector instead of presenting Opus as the only result. Open the interactive model selector. Build Direct demo selection: Claude Opus 5.5 Open Opus, Kimi K3.1 Pro Open Kimi, GPT-6.1 Sol, Codex run Open Sol through Codex, GPT-6 Astra Open Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, second run Open the second Sol run, Gemini 4 Argon Open Argon.

你可以在哪里尝试每个模型？使用实时比较中的“模型”下拉菜单。原始 URL 现在打开选择器，而不是仅将 Opus 作为唯一结果呈现。打开交互式模型选择器。构建直接演示选择：Claude Opus 5.5 打开 Opus，Kimi K3.1 Pro 打开 Kimi，GPT-6.1 Sol, Codex 运行打开 Sol through Codex，GPT-6 Astra 打开 Astra，GPT-6.1 Sol, 第二次运行打开第二次 Sol 运行，Gemini 4 Argon 打开 Argon。

Kimi remains hosted on its original Kimi page. The other five results are served on kartit.net. The selector provides an Open demo link if an embedded result is unavailable. How do the six builds compare? The table keeps manual correctness, interface features and visual judging separate because they measure different things.

Kimi 仍托管在其原始的 Kimi 页面上。其他五个结果在 kartit.net 上提供。如果嵌入的结果不可用，选择器会提供一个“打开演示”链接。这六个构建版本如何比较？该表格将手册正确性、界面功能和视觉判断分开，因为它们衡量的是不同的事物。