Anthropic blocks users for anything touching training larger models

Jiahao Shao@jiahaoshao1Shame on @DarioAmodei / Anthropic. I never distilled Claude—rollouts came from a strong open-source model; Claude just helped submit jobs and run analysis. Still got tagged for “training a competitor,” and now anything touching RFT, SFT, or training larger models gets me blocked, Opus 5.5 downgraded to Opus 5, or the session killed outright. You built your models on the world’s data, then treat paying users doing research automation as the enemy. Pathetic.

Jiahao Shao@jiahaoshao1 对 @DarioAmodei / Anthropic 感到羞耻。我从未蒸馏过 Claude——模型部署来自一个强大的开源模型；Claude 只是协助提交任务和运行分析。但我仍然被标记为“训练竞争对手”，现在任何涉及 RFT、SFT 或训练更大模型的行为都会导致我被封禁、Opus 5.5 被降级为 Opus 5，或者会话直接被终止。你们利用全世界的数据构建了模型，却把进行研究自动化的付费用户视为敌人。真可悲。

Jiahao Shao@jiahaoshao1Oct 31And the anti-distillation crusade is peak double standard. You train on the open web—books, code, forums, everyone else’s work—then ban anyone from learning from your outputs at scale. Protecting a moat is one thing; moralizing it while standing on scraped knowledge is another.

Jiahao Shao@jiahaoshao1 10月31日：这种反蒸馏运动简直是双重标准的巅峰。你们在开放网络上进行训练——书籍、代码、论坛，以及其他所有人的劳动成果——然后却禁止任何人从你们的输出中进行大规模学习。保护护城河是一回事，但站在抓取来的知识之上进行道德绑架则是另一回事。

Jiahao Shao@jiahaoshao1Oct 31I get why small startups refuse buyouts even when big tech waves cash—they’d rather stay independent than inherit that corporate value system. Anthropic sells itself as that independent alternative, then runs the same rigid enterprise lockdown on paying researchers. Claiming Show more

Jiahao Shao@jiahaoshao1 10月31日：我明白为什么小型初创公司即使在大科技公司挥舞现金时也拒绝收购——他们宁愿保持独立，也不愿继承那种企业价值观。Anthropic 将自己标榜为那种独立的替代方案，却对付费研究人员实施同样僵化的企业封锁。声称 显示更多

naughtyheuristic@naughtyheuristcOct 31anthropic trained on the open web then blocked the user who tried to train on the outputs. the moat is the part that still needs the paying researcher to stay outside it. 🤡

naughtyheuristic@naughtyheuristc 10月31日：Anthropic 在开放网络上进行训练，然后封禁了试图在其输出上进行训练的用户。所谓的护城河，就是那种仍然需要付费研究人员被拒之门外的部分。🤡